![\"\"](\"http:\/\/irishexaminerusa.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/2.42240111.jpg\")
Liverpool Football Club\u2019s controversial bid to trademark the word \u2018Liverpool\u2019 has been rejected by the British government\u2019s Intellectual Property Office.<\/p>\nLiverpool Football Club\u2019s controversial bid to trademark the word \u2018Liverpool\u2019 has been rejected by the British government\u2019s Intellectual Property Office.<\/p>\n
The Premier League club insisted their sole aim had been to protect themselves against mass-produced Liverpool FC merchandise and had hoped to trademark the city\u2019s name when used in the context of football products and services.<\/p>\n
But, after accepting the IPO\u2019s decision, the club\u2019s chief executive Peter Moore admitted they had underestimated the level of opposition from independent traders within the city, plus local football clubs and Liverpool City Council.<\/p>\n
The club said in a statement: \u201cLiverpool Football Club can confirm its application to trademark the word \u2018Liverpool\u2019 in the context of football products and services has been unsuccessful.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe club accepts the decision that has been taken by the Intellectual Property Office, due primarily to what the official judgement cites as \u2018the geographical significance\u2019 of Liverpool as a city in comparison to place names that have been trademarked by other football clubs in the UK.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe will, however, continue to aggressively pursue those large-scale operations which seek to illegally exploit our intellectual property and would urge the relevant authorities to take decisive action against such criminal activity wherever it exists.\u201d<\/p>\n
Moore said the club\u2019s intentions had been sincere but they had misunderstood the implications the trademarking would have had on the local community.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe underestimated the reaction to it,\u201d Moore told the Liverpool Echo. \u201cWe had, in very good faith, looked at what we were seeing on a global basis and particularly stuff that was coming into the UK.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe felt obliged to protect the football club and had looked at other similar situations for clubs that had trademarked their place names in a football context, there are numerous examples.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe felt that on behalf of the club we needed to do that, but I think it\u2019s fair to say that we underestimated the emotional reaction to it and that\u2019s our bad.\u201d<\/p>\n
Moore said the club had met with local businesses to explain their intentions.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere was no deliberate action to slip it through,\u201d he added. \u201cWe filed and got on with our business and obviously as things unfolded the reaction was pretty quick and we immediately engaged with the independent retailers and the local football clubs and met with them.<\/p>\n
\u201c(We) reassured them that this was not aimed at them and offered them legal protections for if we had been successful.\u201d<\/p>\n
Liverpool mayor Joe Anderson tweeted: \u201cLFC is a global brand and plays a big part in showcasing our city across the world.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe have a strong relationship with Peter and his team and the club\u2019s importance to the future of this city is without question.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe will always work together for the people of Liverpool.\u201d<\/p>\n