{"id":28013,"date":"2023-05-22T16:00:47","date_gmt":"2023-05-22T20:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/irishexaminerusa.com\/wp\/?p=28013"},"modified":"2023-05-23T08:45:11","modified_gmt":"2023-05-23T12:45:11","slug":"with-a-new-album-in-hand-pop-star-ed-sheeran-is-in-the-news-in-more-ways-than-one","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/irishexaminerusa.com\/wp\/?p=28013","title":{"rendered":"With A New Album In Hand, Pop Star Ed Sheeran is in The News in More Ways Than One"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Report by Brad Balfour<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When I heard about the Ed Sheeran pop-up store that appeared earlier this month, I decided to check it out on Wooster Street in Soho. It was a modest affair with a car stuffed with straw in front of the entrance. Hailing the release of \u201cSubtract,\u201d the shop offered backdrops related to the album which made for a good selfie and various Instagram posts. There were signed CD copies and projections of lyrics displayed on the wall while the songs played throughout. Some of his drawings were on the wall as well. By going there, it gave me the chance to learn something about this star from England with strong Irish roots a solid thatch of ginger hair. His fans seemed reverent but not fanatic.
\u00a0
The store was a celebration of all things which concern Edward Christopher Sheeran as an artist. Born in Halifax, West Yorkshire, England on February 17th, 1991, baby Sheeran was imbued with artistic inclinations right from the start. His father was a curator at Cartwright Hall in Bradford and his mother worked at Manchester City Art Gallery.
\u00a0
Nonetheless, for megastar Sheeran, it\u2019s been the best of times and the worst of times over the past few months. While recently releasing his next mega-hit album, \u201cSubtract,\u201d he also had to handle a career-threatening plagiarism suit. And it wasn\u2019t the first such suit in his stint as an international star.
\u00a0
Despite his successes, the British pop personality has been having a tough time. Though it’s hard to feel sorry for him with his string of successful albums and tours, he sure has racked up a lot of conflicting experiences in a relatively short life.
\u00a0
Given his mega hit status, he has expressed his share of ambivalence about fame and some of the cliches imposed on him as the sugary-voiced, red-haired, leprechaun-like music making machine. That sweetness has been reflected in this pop superstar\u2019s songs and lyrics, but the music and lyrics of \u201cSubtract\u201d actually deal out to his fanbase tunes themes of death and depression.
\u00a0
It\u2019s not the sweet, vulnerable fare of such tunes as \u201cThinking Out Loud\u201d \u2014 which prompted the suit that recently grabbed headlines. Sheeran got more press than any tour announcement or album release event could ever generate. But it wasn\u2019t for the project itself; he garnered it as a defendant in a new copyright infringement trial that, after eight years since the lawsuit was filed, coincidentally ended on the very day before the release of his new record.\u00a0
\u00a0
Sheeran\u2019s wife Cherry Seaborn was diagnosed with a cancerous\u00a0tumor while pregnant with their second daughter, a condition that caused a delay in the treatment that otherwise would have begun immediately. She\u2019s survived and continues to be a particularly profound part of the Sheeran narrative.
\u00a0
The singer lost one of his best friends and earliest champions, Jamal Edwards, who succumbed to a heart attack at 31. Ironically, the singer\/songwriter had a minor hit about six months before with a song about death called \u201cVisiting Hours.\u201d\u00a0
\u00a0
And while all this was happening during February 2022, his four-part Disney+ docuseries, \u201cThe Sum of It All,\u201d was airing. It told the tale of the British superstar and offered his life reflections at that point in time.
\u00a0
Looking back across the years, Sheeran\u2019s legal issues had almost forced him to contemplate ending his public career. In 2017, he settled out of court over claims that his song “Photograph” was a “note-for-note” copy of the chorus in “Amazing” by X Factor UK winner Matt Cardle. Sheeran later regretted settling, saying that it had been done on the advice of lawyers who considered the case “more trouble than it was worth.\u201d But it wasn’t because of the money involved — battling over the song changed his relationship with it. He said: “I didn’t play ‘Photograph’ for ages after that. I just stopped playing it. I felt weird about it, it kind of made me feel dirty.”
\u00a0
Settling that case opened a floodgate of claims, including the “Shape of You” lawsuit. In 2018, legal action was brought against Sheeran, Sony\/ATV Music Publishing and Atlantic Records by the estate and heirs of the late producer Ed Townsend, who co-wrote the song “Let’s Get It On” with Marvin Gaye.
\u00a0
US District Judge Louis Stanton rejected Sheeran’s 2019 call for dismissal of the legal case accusing him of copying parts of the song in “Thinking Out Loud.\u201d The judge said that a jury should decide whether they found “substantial similarities between several of the two works’ musical elements” \u2014 or not. A previous case by Townsend’s estate was dismissed without prejudice in February 2017.

Sheeran was also taken to court in March 2022 for another copyright suit over “Shape of You.” Musicians Sami Chokri and Ross O’Donoghue alleged that the song infringed “particular lines and phrases” of their 2015 composition, “Oh Why.” Sheeran won that case, with Justice Zacaroli ruling that he “neither deliberately nor subconsciously” copied a phrase from “Oh Why” when writing “Shape of You.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Sheeran’s guitar in the Pop-Up store.<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Closely watched by those in music and legal circles, the second case went to trial in New York during April 2023. Sheeran even performed live in order to defend himself. His lawyers argued that while the two songs have similar “building blocks” and a specific chord progression, such features are true for many pop songs. The jury agreed and found in Sheeran\u2019s favor with a unanimous verdict. After winning, Sheeran commented: “These chords are common building blocks which were used to create music long before ‘Let\u2019s Get It On’ was written and will be used to create music long after we are all gone.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

More than anything he has done or that has happened to him lately, Sheeran deserves credit for bringing the huge debate about creativity into focus \u2014 when does someone go from being an influence to becoming a source for copying? Where is the dividing line between being inspired and becoming a plagarizer? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Having been a deejay, I know that the audible connection between one song to the next is essential for a mix. But does that mean that one song is imitating the other so that they can be seamlessly blended together? I don\u2019t want to be the one to offer a conclusive answer, but I\u2019ll support creative freedom in any case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As he lurches into his 30s, the real creative conflict for this popstar is how will his career evolve from this point forward. Will he make further forays into other media? More pop-up stores? Maybe a show of his paintings is next? <\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>