{"id":24937,"date":"2022-01-26T14:46:04","date_gmt":"2022-01-26T19:46:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/irishexaminerusa.com\/wp\/?p=24937"},"modified":"2022-01-26T14:46:07","modified_gmt":"2022-01-26T19:46:07","slug":"mps-told-farmers-in-the-north-left-in-no-mans-land-due-to-ni-protocol","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/irishexaminerusa.com\/wp\/?p=24937","title":{"rendered":"MPs Told Farmers In The North Left In ‘No Man’s Land’ Due To NI Protocol"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"
Sheep on a farm (PA Archive\/PA Images)<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Brexit\u2019s Northern Ireland Protocol has left local farmers in a \u201cno man\u2019s land\u201d amid concerns they will be unable to benefit from new international trade deals, MPs have been told.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Victor Chestnutt, president of the Ulster Farmers\u2019 Union, said the unique regulatory position the North has found itself in could frustrate the efforts of producers to export overseas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mr Chestnutt was one of several witnesses giving evidence to the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee on free trade deals the UK has recently struck with Australia and New Zealand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While expressing concern that the deal has seen the \u201cdoor flung open\u201d for Australian and New Zealand farmers to export produce to the UK, Mr Chestnutt claimed Northern Ireland farmers may not reap the benefits of free trade deals, whether struck by the UK or EU.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Brexit protocol has seen the North remain in the EU single market for goods, meaning European regulatory rules still apply in the region.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe protocol was sold to Northern Ireland as giving us the best of both worlds, but the fact is that our produce cannot be sold on an EU trade deal, so we are limited to UK trade deals,\u201d said Mr Chestnutt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIn the case of divergence (of regulatory rules between NI and GB), our product will be a slightly different standard than of the (rest of the) UK, does that freeze us out of the UK trade deals or leave us at production price disadvantage with the UK?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSo, we are concerned that we could be left in no man\u2019s land.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He said the protocol had already created a no man\u2019s land for farmers in relation to animal medicines and other regulatory issues where the \u201cEU authorization doesn\u2019t cover us nor does the UK\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He added: \u201cThat is a concern going forward that we can\u2019t access both EU and UK free trade deals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The committee also heard evidence from high commissioners from Australia and New Zealand, both of whom emphasized the positives of the free trade deals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Australian High Commissioner George Brandis QC said he had visited the North before the pandemic and spoke with exporters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWhat was apparent to me was there was an anemic amount of business done with Australia from Northern Ireland, but that Northern Ireland businesspeople were extremely eager for the free trade agreement for the opportunities that it presented,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mr Brandis said the agreement is not confined to agri-food produce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt is important to remind ourselves that this is an all economy agreement. And the benefits of the free trade agreement will be felt across the economy, they\u2019ll be felt by some sectors more than others, but they\u2019ll be felt across the economy.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bede Corry, High Commissioner for New Zealand, echoed those comments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis is not solely about impact on one sector, it\u2019s about the opportunities for the United Kingdom as an extremely powerful exporting nation, including a nation which exports agricultural produce, and so this FTA is good news for British exporters, which in turn is good news for the British economy and for British jobs, whether that\u2019s in respect of goods or services or the ability of British people to live and work in New Zealand,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The committee hearing also saw farming and food production representatives express concern about one of the two proposed climate change acts for Northern Ireland.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Two separate climate Bills are currently proceeding through legislative stages in the Assembly \u2013 a private members\u2019 Bill from Green Party NI leader Clare Bailey and one tabled by Environment Minister Edwin Poots.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ms Bailey\u2019s Bill, which is supported by a majority of other Stormont parties, sets a 2045 target for reaching net-zero carbon emissions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mr Poots\u2019s Bill sets the less ambitious goal of reducing emissions by 82% by 2050.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Witnesses told the committee that Ms Bailey\u2019s Bill, if enacted, could have a devastating effect on the farming industry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ian Stevenson, chief executive of the Livestock and Meat Commission for Northern Ireland, said economic analysis of Ms Bailey\u2019s Bill indicated it could result in an 86% reduction in cattle and sheep numbers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He said it had the potential to \u201cdestroy good businesses\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He added: \u201cIn an FTA, yes you\u2019re facing more competition from international players, but through the climate change private member\u2019s Bill effectively you\u2019d almost have to wipe out profitable businesses to achieve the targets that are being met.\u201d<\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>